Citrix User Group Denmark

Post edited 12:51 – 01/12/2009 by Christian Fenneberg
Post edited 12:52 – 01/12/2009 by Christian Fenneberg

Hi all,

After having used too much time on tuning installations all over the country I thought of the old idea Rick Dehlinger had in his original tuning document. I have gathered tips and tricks from colleagues and customers and after doing research on each topic put them into one document. I hope with the help of all of you to make a release once a month as tips are send and verified.

               http://www.dkcug.dk/wp-content…..er_1.0.pdf

Currently the document is in Beta and some sektions are missing completly, but with the help of others these parts will be completed over time.

Please send input to Chr_fenneberg@hotmail.com

Kind regards

Christian

Hej alle,

Efter at have brugt oceaner af tid på at tune diverse installationer kom min hjerne på at samle den viden i et dokument baseret på Rick Dehlingers originale tunings dokument. Jeg har samlet tips og triks fra kollegaer og andre i dokumentet og regner med at lave en “relase” pr. måned.

               http://www.dkcug.dk/wp-content…..er_1.0.pdf

PT. er dokumentet i Beta for der mangler hele sektioner om fx. XenApp (doh) men jeg håber og regner med at i alle kommer med input.

Skriv endelig tilbage på chr_fenneberg@hotmail.com

Mvh

Christian Fenneberg

Hej Thomas,

Mht. B3

Så var jeg nok lige så overrasket som du ved denne oplysning. Men Citrix har i deres test miljø defineret alle deres virtuelle servere med denne indstilling for at få maksimal (eller bedre) udnyttelse af RAM.

Du kan læse meget mere her:

http://community.citrix.com/pa…..d=73564465

Snip:

since this was about 32-bit XenApp, over-assigning resources produces little benefit to XenApp. The 2 core/3.6GB server size was optimal for this study all the way around.

Håber det giver et nogenlund for for svar.

Mvh

Christian